Kirsters Baish| More information is coming out about the horrific shooting that took place at YouTube headquarters on Tuesday. This new information doesn’t exactly fit into the narrative the media is pushing.
Three people were injured on April 3 when a female gunman made her way into the YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California and began shooting. The shooter then took her own life. The left is dead set on pushing the narrative that supports their agenda, but the truth is far from the story that they are claiming. The left wants America to believe that the shooter was a conservative NRA member, but as Trump Jr. pointed out on Tuesday evening in a tweet, this is the furthest thing from the truth.
The shooter, Nasim Aghdam, was a far-left Iranian woman.
Fox went on, “Her pages were littered with strange workout videos, vegan cooking tutorials mixed with graphic animal abuse videos.” Aghdam’s pages had pictures of her involved in PETA protests.
The liberal narrative that all shooters belong to the NRA is null and void at this point. Social media outlets did their best to shut down all of Aghdam’s accounts in order to protect the narrative. Her Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, along with other profiles have been deactivated.
Trump Jr. went public with his hunch that these social media outlets wanted to get rid of any evidence that Aghdam was a liberal.
Trump Jr. wrote on Wednesday, “You think there’s any chance whatsoever that a mass shooters hateful Instagram and YouTube channels would be pulled immediately if they were NRA members as opposed to liberal Vegan PETA activists? Asking for a few million friends in the NRA.”
You think there’s any chance whatsoever that a mass shooters hateful Instagram and YouTube channels would be pulled immediately if they were NRA members as opposed to liberal Vegan PETA activists? Asking for a few million friends in the @NRA
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) April 4, 2018
He had a good point. If the shooter had been a conservative NRA member, you can be sure that the mainstream media would be all over the story. They would be using yet another tragedy as a political tool to push for harsher gun control. Actually, there is zero evidence that any mass shooter in the history of our country had any kind of affiliation with the NRA at all.
I sense a double standard here. Why do a criminal’s political leanings matter at all? A criminal is a criminal is a criminal. There are no two ways about it. Whether a shooter was a conservative or a liberal has no impact on the way the media should be reporting.
Conservative Tribune reported:
One look at tweets from liberals before all of the facts in the YouTube shooting emerged shows just how eager the left was to blame conservatives and the NRA, once again, for a crime they had nothing to do with.
“Another shooting,” posted angry liberal “comedian” Michael Ian Black as the incident unfolded. “I’m going to politicize the f*** out of it, and so should you,” he declared. “The NRA is a terrorist organization.”
We cannot be sure if he was looking to politicize the whole thing now that the shooter seems to be a crazed liberal.
Another liberal on Twitter posted, “If this shooter at YouTube isn’t a white male with far-right leanings, I will eat my f***ing hat. Get rid of the f***ing guns.”
Maybe he should get to chewing.