In case you’re wondering why Democrats (Marxists) on Capitol Hill are so intent on blocking as many of President Trump’s judicial nominees it’s become clear that Hillary Clinton’s criminal cartel – that includes a wide swath of Democrats – cannot withstand the scrutiny of honest courts.
When Hillary Clinton “willingly surrendered” her security clearance at the same time five of her closest aides had their clearances stipped at the same time, you knew another shoe was going to fall.
What? Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley expressed his concerns about the FBI’s handling of Hillary’s “extremely careless handling of very sensitive, highly classified information’’ and what was being done as a result with Hillary Clinton’s security clearance via a letter to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson (since fired by President Trump) back in March of 2017 and the State Department stonewalled his request?
Well that other shoe fell yesterday when Reagan appointee, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth accused career State Department officials of having signed “clearly false” affidavits.
Lamberth’s statement comes more than two and a half years after Clinton’s illegal home-brew server was first discovered. Roll that around in your mind for a while.
The only conclusion is that the State Department hid incriminating evidence to protect Clinton from criminal indictment during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
The affidavits were filed to avoid providing incriminating evidence about then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi terrorist attack, including evidence contained on Clinton’s illegal private email server.
Judge Lamberth claimed to be “shocked” and “dumbfounded” over the FBI granted immunity to Clinton’s attorney and top aide Cheryl Mills.
In his June report, Inspector General Michael Horowitz noted that given Mills’ was also a fact witness, it was “inconsistent with typical investive strategy” for the FBI have allowed Mills to sit in on the their interview of Clinton.
IG Horowitz went on to write:
“[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness’ interview.”
After reading the IG report Lamberth and “learning that she [Mills] had accompanied [Clinton] to her interview” Lamberth was certain that Mills had committed perjury:
“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case.”
“It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system.”
“I don’t know the details of what kind of IG inquiry there was into why these career officials at the State Department would have filed false affidavits with me. I don’t know the details of why the Justice Department lawyers did not know false affidavits were being filed with me, but I was very relieved that I did not accept them and that I allowed limited discovery into what had happened.