It has been reported by the Gateway Pundit that sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who has been reviewing all of the evidence provided by Christine Blasey Ford and her attorneys to back up accusations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of a 36-year-old alleged sexual assault, has released a report that entirely exonerates Kavanaugh.
The Democrats must be scrambling …
Jacob Wohl tweeted out:
It appears that Rachel Mitchell finds Ford's allegations totally suspect, potentially fraudulent pic.twitter.com/3dJkIGPxri
— Jacob Wohl (@JacobAWohl) October 1, 2018
Mitchell was hired on as a non-partisan third-party on the case. She has over 25 years under her belt prosecuting sex crimes in Arizona state. After carefully reviewing the accusations made by Christine Blasey Ford, which included numerous hours of testimony in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has released her official report. The report highlights more than twelve extreme inconsistencies in the accusers story. She suggests that the accusations may not be true at all.
The following are quotes taken directly from the report:
1 “Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.”
2 “Dr. Ford struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.”
3 “When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.”
4 “Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question—details that could help corroborate her account.”
5 “She does not remember in what house the alleged assault took place or where that house was located with any specificity.”
6 “Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.”
In the report’s conclusion, Mitchell wrote, “A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.”
What could have been the most interesting thing that Mitchell found while reviewing the reports was that “The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorney’s likely affected her account.”
The veteran sex crimes prosecutor ostensibly alleges that the comments made by Blasey Ford’s own attorneys and congressional Democrats could have had an influence on the accuser’s recollection and truthfulness.
Michael Bromwich, attorney to Christine Blasey Ford, interrupted Mitchell’s lines of questioning numerous times. Bromwich is the same guy who is representing former FBI Director Andrew McCabe, in case you were wondering.
Page two of Mitchell’s report basically is the perfect summary of the whole thing. She wrote, “I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
You heard her, ladies and gentleman. She just exonerated Kavanaugh.
Can we just wrap this up already?